You Own Wall Street › Companies › Steel Dynamics
Steel Dynamics shareholder proposals 2026
What shareholders asked Steel Dynamics to do, and how the funds holding Americans’ retirement savings voted on it: the funds in the 401(k) plans we index and the most widely held funds beyond them, with the filing behind every vote.
6 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social
Should Steel Dynamics disclose the politics its money pays for?
Shareholders asked the company to publish its political spending — direct contributions and money routed through trade associations and other third parties — and whether that spending matches the values the company states publicly.
“SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - AVOID POLITICAL SPENDING BRAND DAMAGE”
1 of 5 funds we track voted for it.
| Fund | Vote | Shares voted |
|---|---|---|
| Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund | FOR | 1,168,000 |
| Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | AGAINST | 190,090 |
| Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Fund Inc | AGAINST | 180,765 |
| T. Rowe Price Diversified Mid-Cap Growth Fund, Inc. | AGAINST | 56,300 |
| Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund | AGAINST | 17,368 |
The same proposal was put to Palantir Technologies, Merck, Otis Worldwide, O'Reilly Automotive, Pilgrim's Pride, Huntington Ingalls Industries.
6 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social
Should Steel Dynamics disclose the politics its money pays for?
Shareholders asked the company to publish its political spending — direct contributions and money routed through trade associations and other third parties — and whether that spending matches the values the company states publicly.
“SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - AVOID POLITICAL SPENDING BRAND DAMAGE”
0 of 1 funds we track voted for it.
| Fund | Vote | Shares voted |
|---|---|---|
| John Hancock Disciplined Value Fund | AGAINST | 729,733 |
The same proposal was put to Palantir Technologies, Merck, Otis Worldwide, O'Reilly Automotive, Pilgrim's Pride, Huntington Ingalls Industries.
6 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social
Should Steel Dynamics disclose the politics its money pays for?
Shareholders asked the company to publish its political spending — direct contributions and money routed through trade associations and other third parties — and whether that spending matches the values the company states publicly.
“Shareholder proposal - avoid political spending brand damage”
1 of 1 funds we track voted for it.
| Fund | Vote | Shares voted |
|---|---|---|
| PGIM Real Assets Fund | FOR | 100,835 |
The same proposal was put to Palantir Technologies, Merck, Otis Worldwide, O'Reilly Automotive, Pilgrim's Pride, Huntington Ingalls Industries.
Vote these yourself
Say how you would have voted, then see what your own fund did. Open the ballot deck →