You Own Wall Street › Funds › Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund

Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund (CSMEX) proxy voting record 2026

Three of its ballots from this season. Vote first, then see what it did with the shares your savings paid for.

The question on the ballot

As filed

Carillon Series Trust files this fund's proxy votes with the SEC once a year. This is what it did with the shares your retirement savings paid for.

SourceProxy-voting record filed by Carillon Series Trust on 2026-08-13 · open the filing · vote table (BRD017_0000897111_2026.xml, 11 MB)

TickersCSMEX (Class A), CSMFX (Class C), UMBMX (Class I), CSMUX (Class R-6) · share classes of one fund, with one proxy-voting record · as listed in its latest SEC filing of proxy votes

How it voted, by issue

Fund companies sometimes file the same proposal under different subjects. So that funds can be compared, each proposal is counted under the subject most of the filings we read gave it, the same for every fund on this site. Counted by this fund’s own filing alone, 4 of its 28 shareholder proposals would sit under a different issue, or under none. On management's own executive pay resolutions, this fund voted in favour 94.4% of the time across 90 votes.

IssueProposals facedBackedShare backed
Climate & environment400%
Workers & human rights100%
Corporate governance201365%
Other social issues300%

Ballots it voted

Albertsons Companies, Inc. · 7 August 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Regarding Food Waste Reporting.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 1,152,068 shares

“Stockholder Proposal Regarding Food Waste Reporting.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Digital Realty Trust, Inc. · 29 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Digital Realty Trust report on its effect on water where it operates?

Shareholders asked for a report on the company’s water use and discharge in the places it operates, and on whether that use is compatible with the local right to water.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 116,421 shares

“A stockholder proposal regarding enhanced water risk disclosure, if properly presented.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Albertsons Companies, Inc. · 7 August 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights

Should Albertsons assess the human rights risks its own operations create?

Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 1,152,068 shares

“Stockholder Proposal for a Report on Human Rights Policy and Human Rights Due Diligence.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. · 23 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder

For the adoption of a majority voting standard.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 960,406 shares

“Shareholder proposal for the adoption of a majority voting standard.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Delta Air Lines, Inc. · 18 June 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder

Should Delta Air Lines’s shareholders be able to act without waiting for a meeting?

Shareholders asked for the right to act by written consent — to approve a measure once holders of enough shares agree in writing, instead of waiting for the company to schedule a meeting.

FOR  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 575,901 shares

“A shareholder proposal requesting the ability for shareholders to act by written consent.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Albertsons Companies, Inc. · 7 August 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social

For a Report on Risks of State Policies on Reproductive Health Care.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 1,152,068 shares

“Stockholder Proposal for a Report on Risks of State Policies on Reproductive Health Care.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation · 23 July 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social

Should Booz Allen Hamilton Holding disclose the politics its money pays for?

Shareholders asked the company to publish its political spending — direct contributions and money routed through trade associations and other third parties — and whether that spending matches the values the company states publicly.

AGAINST  Carillon Scout Mid Cap Fund voted with 130,996 shares

“Vote on a stockholder proposal regarding a report on political spending.”

SourceCarillon Series Trust, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-13 · accession 0001438934-26-000714 · series S000058963 · open the filing

Other funds Carillon Series Trust votes

The same filer reports these alongside this one, in the same annual filing.

Carillon Chartwell Mid Cap Value Fund95.5% for exec payCarillon Chartwell Small Cap Fund84.6% for exec payCarillon Chartwell Small Cap Growth Fund84.6% for exec payCarillon Chartwell Small Cap Value Fund100% for exec payCarillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund75.5% for exec payCarillon ClariVest International Stock Fund93% for exec payCarillon Eagle Growth & Income Fund81.6% for exec payCarillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth Fund87.8% for exec payRJ Eagle GCM Dividend Select Income ETF88.9% for exec payRJ Eagle Vertical Income ETF100% for exec pay

No 401(k) plan we index offers this fund. Its record is here because the fund files it with the SEC, as every fund must: whoever holds it, in an IRA, a brokerage account or a plan we have not indexed, the fund votes those shares as shown on this page.

More funds no plan we index offers, and how each voted →