You Own Wall Street › Funds › Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CTCAX) proxy voting record 2026

Three of its ballots from this season. Vote first, then see what it did with the shares your savings paid for.

The question on the ballot

As filed

Columbia Funds Series Trust I files this fund's proxy votes with the SEC once a year. This is what it did with the shares your retirement savings paid for.

SourceProxy-voting record filed by Columbia Funds Series Trust I on 2026-08-18 · open the filing · vote table (ProxyVotingTable.xml, 32 MB)

TickersCTCAX, CTHCX, CMTFX, CTHRX, CGTUX, CGTDX · share classes of one fund, with one proxy-voting record · as listed in its latest SEC filing of proxy votes

How it voted, by issue

Fund companies sometimes file the same proposal under different subjects. So that funds can be compared, each proposal is counted under the subject most of the filings we read gave it, the same for every fund on this site. Counted by this fund’s own filing alone, 1 of its 109 shareholder proposals would sit under a different issue, or under none. On management's own executive pay resolutions, this fund voted in favour 86.3% of the time across 73 votes.

IssueProposals facedBackedShare backed
Climate & environment1400%
Workers & human rights1100%
Pay equity & inclusion100%
Executive pay5120%
Corporate governance473676.6%
Other social issues3139.7%

Ballots it voted

NVIDIA Corporation · 24 June 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Nvidia publish a fuller account of its emissions and how it plans to cut them?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose its greenhouse gas emissions more completely, or to have its reduction targets independently assessed, so that the plan can be checked rather than taken on trust.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 3,708,557 shares

“Approval of a non-binding stockholder proposal requesting reporting on greenhouse gas emissions from the use of our sold products.”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Alphabet Inc. · 5 June 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Alphabet publish a fuller account of its emissions and how it plans to cut them?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose its greenhouse gas emissions more completely, or to have its reduction targets independently assessed, so that the plan can be checked rather than taken on trust.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 618,707 shares

“Shareholder proposal regarding an enhanced disclosure on climate goals”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Microsoft Corporation · 5 December 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights

Should Microsoft assess the human rights risks its own operations create?

Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 729,105 shares

“Report on Data Operations in Human Rights Hotspots”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Microsoft Corporation · 5 December 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights

Should Microsoft assess the human rights risks its own operations create?

Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 729,105 shares

“Report on Human Rights Due Diligence”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Adobe Inc. · 15 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion

Should Adobe disclose, or change, who sits on its board?

Shareholders asked the company to publish a board skills-and-diversity matrix, or to commit to a minimum representation of women among its directors.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 32,674 shares

“Stockholder Proposal Regarding Board Matrix.”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Meta Platforms, Inc. · 27 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay

Regarding annual vote regarding executive pay.

FOR  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 161,626 shares

“A shareholder proposal regarding annual vote regarding executive pay.”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Adobe Inc. · 15 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay

Should shareholders get a vote before Adobe pays a departing executive?

Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.

AGAINST  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 32,674 shares

“Stockholder Proposal Regarding Vote on Golden Parachutes.”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

NVIDIA Corporation · 24 June 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder

Should a simple majority be enough to pass a measure at Nvidia?

Shareholders asked the company to replace its supermajority voting requirements with a simple majority, so that a measure supported by most shares actually carries.

FOR  Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund voted with 3,708,557 shares

“Approval of a non-binding stockholder proposal requesting the replacement of supermajority voting provisions in our charter and bylaws with a simple majority voting standard.”

SourceColumbia Funds Series Trust I, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-18 · accession 0001193125-26-355143 · series S000012075 · open the filing

Other funds Columbia Funds Series Trust I votes

The same filer reports these alongside this one, in the same annual filing.

Columbia Balanced Fund89.7% for exec payColumbia Contrarian Core Fund89.7% for exec payColumbia Cornerstone Growth Fund94.4% for exec payColumbia Dividend Income Fund90.8% for exec payColumbia Emerging Markets Fund66.7% for exec payColumbia Integrated Large Cap Growth Fund II89.3% for exec payColumbia International Dividend Income Fund94.7% for exec payColumbia Real Estate Equity Fund89.8% for exec payColumbia Select Large Cap Growth Fund95.5% for exec payColumbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund89.7% for exec pay

No 401(k) plan we index offers this fund. Its record is here because the fund files it with the SEC, as every fund must: whoever holds it, in an IRA, a brokerage account or a plan we have not indexed, the fund votes those shares as shown on this page.

More funds no plan we index offers, and how each voted →