You Own Wall Street › Funds › Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund

Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund (HWSM) proxy voting record 2026

Three of its ballots from this season. Vote first, then see what it did with the shares your savings paid for.

The question on the ballot

As filed

Hotchkis & Wiley Funds files this fund's proxy votes with the SEC once a year. This is what it did with the shares your retirement savings paid for.

SourceProxy-voting record filed by Hotchkis & Wiley Funds on 2026-08-28 · open the filing · vote table (proxyvoting.xml, 13 MB)

TickerHWSM · as listed in its latest SEC filing of proxy votes

How it voted, by issue

Fund companies sometimes file the same proposal under different subjects. So that funds can be compared, each proposal is counted under the subject most of the filings we read gave it, the same for every fund on this site. On management's own executive pay resolutions, this fund voted in favour 96.9% of the time across 128 votes.

IssueProposals facedBackedShare backed
Climate & environment4125%
Pay equity & inclusion300%
Executive pay11100%
Corporate governance301240%
Other social issues3133.3%

Ballots it voted

Harley-Davidson, Inc. · 21 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Harley-Davidson disclose what it finances, not just what it emits?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose the emissions attached to its lending, underwriting or energy mix — the ratio of clean to fossil financing, or an assessment of its clients’ own transition plans — rather than reporting only the emissions of its own offices.

AGAINST  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 499 shares

“To vote on a shareholder proposal regarding a climate transition plan.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

The Travelers Companies, Inc. · 20 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Travelers publish a fuller account of its emissions and how it plans to cut them?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose its greenhouse gas emissions more completely, or to have its reduction targets independently assessed, so that the plan can be checked rather than taken on trust.

AGAINST  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 83 shares

“Shareholder proposal relating to a report on climate-related pricing and coverage decisions, if presented at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Universal Health Services, Inc. · 20 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion

Should Universal Health Services disclose more about the people it employs?

Shareholders asked for fuller disclosure of the company’s human capital — the composition of the workforce, turnover, and how the company invests in the people it employs.

AGAINST  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 138 shares

“Stockholder proposal to adopt a policy requiring Universal Health Services, Inc. to publicly disclose its workforce diversity, if properly presented at the meeting.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Workday, Inc. · 16 June 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion

To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of employee retention rates by demographic category.

AGAINST  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 344 shares

“To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of employee retention rates by demographic category.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Humana Inc. · 16 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay

Should shareholders get a vote before Humana pays a departing executive?

Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.

FOR  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 84 shares

“The stockholder proposal requesting shareholder approval requirement for excessive golden parachutes, if properly presented at the meeting.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Citizens Financial Group, Inc. · 23 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder

For the adoption of a majority voting standard.

AGAINST  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 466 shares

“Shareholder proposal for the adoption of a majority voting standard.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. · 5 May 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder

Should every Fortune Brands Innovations director face election every year?

Shareholders asked the company to end its staggered board, so that all directors stand for election annually rather than once every three years.

FOR  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 451 shares

“If properly presented, a stockholder proposal to elect each director annually”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Sonoco Products Company · 15 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Social

Should Sonoco Products disclose the politics its money pays for?

Shareholders asked the company to publish its political spending — direct contributions and money routed through trade associations and other third parties — and whether that spending matches the values the company states publicly.

FOR  Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Diversified Value Fund voted with 228 shares

“Advisory (non-binding) shareholder proposal - avoid brand damage from political spending.”

SourceHotchkis & Wiley Funds, Form N-PX filed 2026-08-28 · accession 0001104659-26-103313 · series S000091359 · open the filing

Other funds Hotchkis & Wiley Funds votes

The same filer reports these alongside this one, in the same annual filing.

Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund91.3% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley High Yield Fund100% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Disciplined Value Fund90.7% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fundamental Value Fund89.8% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund96.2% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund89.7% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund94.1% for exec payHotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value Fund100% for exec payHotchkis and Wiley International Small Cap Diversified Value Fund77% for exec payHotchkis and Wiley International Value Fund100% for exec pay

No 401(k) plan we index offers this fund. Its record is here because the fund files it with the SEC, as every fund must: whoever holds it, in an IRA, a brokerage account or a plan we have not indexed, the fund votes those shares as shown on this page.

More funds no plan we index offers, and how each voted →