You Own Wall Street › Companies › CF Industries Holdings
CF Industries Holdings shareholder proposals 2026
What shareholders asked CF Industries Holdings to do, and how the funds holding Americans’ retirement savings voted on it: the funds in the 401(k) plans we index and the most widely held funds beyond them, with the filing behind every vote.
28 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay
Should shareholders get a vote before CF Industries Holdings pays a departing executive?
Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.
“Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder approval requirement for excessive golden parachutes, if properly presented at the meeting.”
16 of 26 funds we track voted for it.
| Fund | Vote | Shares voted |
|---|---|---|
| Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | AGAINST | 4,827,530 |
| Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Index Fund | AGAINST | 3,540,062 |
| Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value Index Fund | AGAINST | 2,270,385 |
| Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | FOR | 2,256,977 |
| Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund | FOR | 2,135,000 |
| T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund | AGAINST | 2,105,000 |
| U.S. Targeted Value Portfolio | FOR | 1,127,021 |
| Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund | AGAINST | 645,699 |
| Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund | AGAINST | 592,817 |
| Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | FOR | 590,242 |
| Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund | AGAINST | 483,210 |
| T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund | AGAINST | 269,291 |
| Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | FOR | 243,322 |
| the U.S. Large Cap Value Series | FOR | 206,254 |
The same proposal was put to Capital One Financial, Adobe, Humana.
28 April 2026 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay
Should shareholders get a vote before CF Industries Holdings pays a departing executive?
Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.
“Shareholder proposal regarding shareholder approval requirement for excessive golden parachutes, if properly presented at the meeting.”
0 of 6 funds we track voted for it.
| Fund | Vote | Shares voted |
|---|---|---|
| John Hancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund | AGAINST | 2,338,254 |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | AGAINST | 354,535 |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | AGAINST | 278,126 |
| iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | AGAINST | 129,684 |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Fund | AGAINST | 28,159 |
| WOA All Asset I | AGAINST | 28,159 |
The same proposal was put to Capital One Financial, Adobe, Humana.
Vote these yourself
Say how you would have voted, then see what your own fund did. Open the ballot deck →