You Own Wall Street › Funds › Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio

Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio (GQLVX) proxy voting record 2026

Three of its ballots from this season. Vote first, then see what it did with the shares your savings paid for.

The question on the ballot

As filed

Glenmede Fund files this fund's proxy votes with the SEC once a year. This is what it did with the shares your retirement savings paid for.

SourceProxy-voting record filed by Glenmede Fund on 2026-07-31 · open the filing · vote table (proxytable.xml, 9.9 MB)

TickerGQLVX · as listed in its latest SEC filing of proxy votes

How it voted, by issue

Fund companies sometimes file the same proposal under different subjects. So that funds can be compared, each proposal is counted under the subject most of the filings we read gave it, the same for every fund on this site. On management's own executive pay resolutions, this fund voted in favour 86.5% of the time across 74 votes.

IssueProposals facedBackedShare backed
Climate & environment221045.5%
Workers & human rights55100%
Pay equity & inclusion4375%
Executive pay5120%
Corporate governance241562.5%
Other social issues6350%

Ballots it voted

Centene Corporation · 13 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Centene publish a fuller account of its emissions and how it plans to cut them?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose its greenhouse gas emissions more completely, or to have its reduction targets independently assessed, so that the plan can be checked rather than taken on trust.

FOR  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 737 shares

“STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL TO DISCLOSE PLAN TO REDUCE TOTAL CONTRIBUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE.”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Centene Corporation · 13 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment

Should Centene publish a fuller account of its emissions and how it plans to cut them?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose its greenhouse gas emissions more completely, or to have its reduction targets independently assessed, so that the plan can be checked rather than taken on trust.

FOR  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 737 shares

“STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL FOR REPORT ON CLIMATE RISK TO RETIREMENT INVESTMENTS.”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Johnson & Johnson · 24 April 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights

Should Johnson & Johnson assess the human rights risks its own operations create?

Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.

FOR  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 130 shares

“Produce a human rights impact assessment”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Gilead Sciences, Inc. · 7 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights

Should Gilead Sciences assess the human rights risks its own operations create?

Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.

FOR  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 117 shares

“To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting a comprehensive human rights policy and human rights due diligence process, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Gilead Sciences, Inc. · 7 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion

Should the gap between Gilead Sciences’s top executive pay and its typical worker’s pay count for something?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose the ratio between its highest-paid executive and its median employee — and, in the versions filed as a “pay ratio factor”, to take that ratio into account when the board sets executive pay rather than treating it as a footnote.

AGAINST  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 117 shares

“To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting the CEO pay ratio factor be included in the Company's executive compensation programs, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

The Procter & Gamble Company · 8 October 2024 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion

Should Procter & Gamble publish the raw pay gap between its workers by gender and race?

Shareholders asked for “unadjusted” median pay gap figures — the plain difference between what women and men, and white and non-white employees, are paid across the whole company. Companies usually publish an adjusted number instead, which compares people in the same role and so cannot show whether one group is concentrated in the lower-paid roles.

FOR  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 82 shares

“Shareholder Proposal - Pay Gap Reporting”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Pfizer Inc. · 24 April 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay

Should shareholders get a vote before Pfizer pays a departing executive?

Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.

AGAINST  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 1,288 shares

“Shareholder Vote Regarding Golden Parachutes”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Comcast Corporation · 18 June 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay

Should the gap between Comcast’s top executive pay and its typical worker’s pay count for something?

Shareholders asked the company to disclose the ratio between its highest-paid executive and its median employee — and, in the versions filed as a “pay ratio factor”, to take that ratio into account when the board sets executive pay rather than treating it as a footnote.

AGAINST  Disciplined U.S. Value Equity Portfolio voted with 1,039 shares

“Consider "CEO pay ratio factor" in executive compensation”

SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000059607 · open the filing

Other funds Glenmede Fund votes

The same filer reports these alongside this one, in the same annual filing.

Disciplined International Equity Portfolio88% for exec payDisciplined U.S. Equity Portfolio87.3% for exec payDisciplined U.S. Growth Equity Portfolio88.9% for exec payEnergy Resilience Portfolio88.2% for exec payLong/Short Equity Portfolio92.8% for exec paySmall Cap Equity Portfolio95.5% for exec paySMID Core Equity Portfolio84.2% for exec payStrategic Equity Portfolio91.4% for exec payTotal Market Plus Equity Portfolio97.3% for exec pay

No 401(k) plan we index offers this fund. Its record is here because the fund files it with the SEC, as every fund must: whoever holds it, in an IRA, a brokerage account or a plan we have not indexed, the fund votes those shares as shown on this page.

More funds no plan we index offers, and how each voted →