You Own Wall Street › Funds › SMID Core Equity Portfolio
SMID Core Equity Portfolio (GWILX) proxy voting record 2026
Three of its ballots from this season. Vote first, then see what it did with the shares your savings paid for.
The question on the ballot
As filed
Glenmede Fund files this fund's proxy votes with the SEC once a year. This is what it did with the shares your retirement savings paid for.
SourceProxy-voting record filed by Glenmede Fund on 2026-07-31 · open the filing · vote table (proxytable.xml, 9.9 MB)
TickersGWILX, GWTLX · share classes of one fund, with one proxy-voting record · as listed in its latest SEC filing of proxy votes
How it voted, by issue
Fund companies sometimes file the same proposal under different subjects. So that funds can be compared, each proposal is counted under the subject most of the filings we read gave it, the same for every fund on this site. On management's own executive pay resolutions, this fund voted in favour 84.2% of the time across 57 votes.
| Issue | Proposals faced | Backed | Share backed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Climate & environment | 18 | 10 | 55.6% |
| Workers & human rights | 5 | 5 | 100% |
| Pay equity & inclusion | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| Executive pay | 3 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Corporate governance | 17 | 12 | 70.6% |
| Other social issues | 13 | 9 | 69.2% |
Ballots it voted
Bank of America Corporation · 22 April 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment
Should Bank of America say whether its lobbying matches the climate targets it announces?
Shareholders asked the company to report on whether its own lobbying — and the lobbying done by the trade associations it funds — is consistent with the climate goals it publishes.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 7,211 shares
“Shareholder proposal request report on lobbying alignment with Bank of America's climate goals”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Bank of America Corporation · 22 April 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Climate & environment
Should Bank of America disclose what it finances, not just what it emits?
Shareholders asked the company to disclose the emissions attached to its lending, underwriting or energy mix — the ratio of clean to fossil financing, or an assessment of its clients’ own transition plans — rather than reporting only the emissions of its own offices.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 7,211 shares
“Shareholder proposal requesting disclosure of energy financing ratio”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Gilead Sciences, Inc. · 7 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights
Should Gilead Sciences assess the human rights risks its own operations create?
Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 4,793 shares
“To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting a comprehensive human rights policy and human rights due diligence process, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Merck & Co., Inc. · 27 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Workforce & human rights
Should Merck assess the human rights risks its own operations create?
Shareholders asked for an assessment of the human rights risks arising from the company’s operations and business relationships, and for the findings to be published.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 1,072 shares
“Shareholder proposal regarding a human rights impact assessment.”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Gilead Sciences, Inc. · 7 May 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion
Should the gap between Gilead Sciences’s top executive pay and its typical worker’s pay count for something?
Shareholders asked the company to disclose the ratio between its highest-paid executive and its median employee — and, in the versions filed as a “pay ratio factor”, to take that ratio into account when the board sets executive pay rather than treating it as a footnote.
AGAINST SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 4,793 shares
“To vote on a stockholder proposal requesting the CEO pay ratio factor be included in the Company's executive compensation programs, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Mastercard Incorporated · 24 June 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Pay equity & inclusion
Should an independent auditor examine how Mastercard Incorporated affects civil rights?
Shareholders asked the board to commission an independent, third-party audit of the company’s impact on civil rights and racial equity — its workforce, its customers and the communities it operates in — and to publish what the auditor finds.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 771 shares
“Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting a racial equity audit report”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Comcast Corporation · 18 June 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay
Should the gap between Comcast’s top executive pay and its typical worker’s pay count for something?
Shareholders asked the company to disclose the ratio between its highest-paid executive and its median employee — and, in the versions filed as a “pay ratio factor”, to take that ratio into account when the board sets executive pay rather than treating it as a footnote.
AGAINST SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 10,351 shares
“Consider "CEO pay ratio factor" in executive compensation”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Citigroup Inc. · 29 April 2025 · put on the ballot by shareholder · Executive pay
Should shareholders get a vote before Citigroup pays a departing executive?
Shareholders asked the company to seek shareholder approval for any severance package to a senior executive above a set multiple of salary and bonus — so that very large exit payments cannot be agreed by the board alone.
FOR SMID Core Equity Portfolio voted with 4,300 shares
“Stockholder proposal requesting a shareholder vote regarding excessive golden parachutes.”
SourceGlenmede Fund, Form N-PX filed 2026-07-31 · accession 0001133228-26-011128 · series S000052159 · open the filing
Other funds Glenmede Fund votes
The same filer reports these alongside this one, in the same annual filing.
No 401(k) plan we index offers this fund. Its record is here because the fund files it with the SEC, as every fund must: whoever holds it, in an IRA, a brokerage account or a plan we have not indexed, the fund votes those shares as shown on this page.